Hi,

Le 29/09/2015 19:06, Samuel Just a écrit :
> It's an EIO.  The osd got an EIO from the underlying fs.  That's what
> causes those asserts.  You probably want to redirect to the relevant
> fs maling list.

Thanks.

I didn't get any answer on this from BTRFS developers yet. The problem
seems hard to reproduce though (we still have the same configuration in
production without any new crash and we only had a total of 3 OSD crashes).

I'll just say for reference that BTRFS with kernel 3.18.9 looks
suspicious to me (from the events that happened to us on a mixed
3.18.9/4.0.5 cluster statistically there's about 80% chances that
there's a BTRFS bug in 3.18.9 solved in 4.0.5).

Best regards,

Lionel
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to