I'm working with some teams who would like to not only create ACLs within 
RADOSGW to a tenant level, they would like to tailor ACLs to users within that 
tenant.  After trial and error, I can only seem to get ACLs to stick at a 
tenant level using the keystone tenant ID uuid.

Is this expected behavior for RadosGW ?  Can you only assign bucket ACLs on a 
tenant level with Keystone auth?  There doesn't seem to be a lot of doco out 
there around RadosGW with Keystone auth and its implications.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to