What's the full output of "Ceph -s"? Are your new crush rules actually satisfiable? Is your cluster filling up? -Greg
On Saturday, November 14, 2015, Peter Theobald <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi list, > > I have a 3 node ceph cluster with a total of 9 ods (2,3 and 4 with > different size drives). I changed the layout (failure domain from per osd > to per host and changed min_size) and I now have a few pgs stuck in peering > or remapped+peering for a couple of day now. > > The hosts are under powered. 2x hp microservers and a single i5 desktop > grade machine so not super powerful. The network is fast though (bonded gb > ethernet with dedicated switch). > > I'm concerned that the remapped+peering pgs are stuck. All the nodes in > peering or remapped+peering are stuck inactive and unclean so i'm concerned > about data loss. Do I just need to wait for them to fix themselves? I > cannot see any mention of unfound objects when I query the remapped pgs so > I think i'm ok and just need to be patient. I have 128 pgs across 9 osds so > probably have a lot of objects per pg. Total data is about 4TB > > Regards > > Pete >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
