You're right stijn, I apologize that we did not bump the release number in this case. That would have been the correct thing to do, but our build system simply isn't set up to do that easily, and we wanted to get a fix out as soon as possible.
- Ken On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Stijn De Weirdt <stijn.dewei...@ugent.be> wrote: > did you recreate new rpms with same version/release? it would be better > to make new rpms with different release (e.g. 9.2.0-1). we have > snapshotted mirrors and nginx caches between ceph yum repo and the nodes > that install the rpms, so cleaning the cache locally will not help. > > stijn > > On 11/11/2015 01:06 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Bob R <b...@drinksbeer.org> wrote: >>> We've got two problems trying to update our cluster to infernalis- >> >> >> This was our bad. As indicated in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13746 >> , Alfredo rebuilt CentOS 7 infernalis packages, re-signed them, and >> re-uploaded them to the same location on download.ceph.com. Please >> clear your yum cache (`yum makecache`) and try again. >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
