On 18 December 2015 at 15:48, Don Waterloo <don.water...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 17 December 2015 at 21:36, Francois Lafont <flafdiv...@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have ceph cluster currently unused and I have (to my mind) very low
>> performances.
>> I'm not an expert in benchs, here an example of quick bench:
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> # fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1
>> --name=readwrite --filename=rw.data --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --size=300MB
>> --readwrite=randrw --rwmixread=50
>> readwrite: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio,
>> iodepth=64
>> fio-2.1.3
>>
>> ...
>
> I am seeing the same sort of issue.
> If i run your 'fio' command sequence on my cephfs, i see ~120 iops.
> If i run it on one of the underlying osd (e.g. in /var... on the mount
> point of the xfs), i get ~20k iops.
>
>
> If i run:
rbd -p mypool create speed-test-image --size 1000
rbd -p mypool bench-write speed-test-image
I get
bench-write io_size 4096 io_threads 16 bytes 1073741824 pattern seq
SEC OPS OPS/SEC BYTES/SEC
1 79053 79070.82 323874082.50
2 144340 72178.81 295644410.60
3 221975 73997.57 303094057.34
elapsed: 10 ops: 262144 ops/sec: 26129.32 bytes/sec: 107025708.32
which is *much* faster than the cephfs.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
