I believe so. I'm using ceph-9.2.0. On Jan 2, 2016 9:53 AM, "Dan Nica" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you using latest ceph-deploy ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Adam > Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 4:22 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ceph-users] systemd support? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > I'm running into the same install problem described here: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg23533.html > > I tried compiling from source (ceph-9.2.0) to see if it had been fixed in > the latest code, but I got the same error as with the pre-compiled > binaries. Is there any solution or workaround to this? > > If not, could someone point me to the code which is responsible and I'll > see if I can fix it up and submit a patch? > > Thanks, > Adam > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWhzRRAAoJENsDzYGorJFPl9sP/RLz1putNY9UD73YBegNo4AK > Yhb0QQ2Jkv1m+FWa9blyhUqjYai2Fn8shDcjst2bHG+vk4l7wKxJvhzI/DTdBInr > fDI6iAxZ+NKku5/CstA3dLxxfJxshRMumHsI+4fs0J0CMMe9/fl/6nIu+BILfjXK > ci0Z4cNHzg0fO3DB1Q8s45/vkcDhOcC0vX8by5dynNNjlyupDvocGKR1rZ0TTM56 > iidrK/QXhqGcl/2+eHVEAcjoE1tIevWtBQBXC3G9FepWxx/k4UgPc2IKFLVtKs2J > qY9/jT4zG4fmONI6mk4ApNHss0c5vdt3uTflcGi3R9dMzTSViH+uyoqRl0RjGYVa > FAdHfV3oLAex0ZOMFTpYaU5D7fPdfkSB20Z0YYH3vlwvuV0v9Xn+jQA0Z046FGs9 > 86Z6zVGbgplWi204q64Um2KY9MhtSPtmlJ8d5X8+hxsFNDeRPQiLAPCw70fOcolh > WBJlgAD4+dRFHSm+HAzCJVxdwMVBLl6XTC3dmpwv63bDXoZfF3kJ0JTdWtYFqyiD > hkH/OEY8AQ5FNh0R+Qgn2B+XF1BBvK9+BSjXvaarEo4QItwqzXiJzyk9CeTcdjh9 > xg53JTrClMzGZQ1P7gfR2D18bMPlaFt7zuu4xQJAui55oq/ag6BelTMFjm3Uh62U > NhdYAqPkGuYVoIpPDxCU > =HqHA > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
