On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Florian Haas <flor...@hastexo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com> wrote:
>> On 01/26/2016 08:29 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> we recently worked a bit on running a full static website just on
>>> radosgw (akin to
>>> http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/WebsiteHosting.html),
>>> and didn't find a good how-to writeup out there. So we did a bit of
>>> fiddling with radosgw and HAproxy, and wrote one:
>>> https://www.hastexo.com/resources/hints-and-kinks/hosting-website-radosgw/#.VqfGx99vFhG
>>>
>>> Hopefully some of you find this useful. If you spot errors or
>>> omissions, just let us know in the comments at the bottom of the page.
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Were you aware of this work going on:
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/wip-static-website
>>
>> This might be in the RADOS Gateway soon and then you don't need HAProxy
>> anymore.
>
> The moment this lands in a release, we'll be more than happy to ditch
> the HAProxy request/response mangling bits. But that WIP branch hasn't
> seen commits in 4 months, so we took it as an exercise in coming up

Here's a more up-to-date branch:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/wip-rgw-static-website-yehuda

We're currently testing it, and the plan is to get it in before jewel.
One caveat though, the error page handling still has some issues so at
the moment so the feature will be disabled by default for now.

Yehuda

> with something workable as an interim solution. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Florian
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to