On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Zhao Xu <xuzh....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not lucky on the ceph-fuse
>
> [root@igc-head ~]# ceph-fuse -d -m igc-head,is1,i1,i2,i3:6789 /mnt/igcfs/
> 2016-02-03 04:55:08.756420 7fe3f7437780  0 ceph version 0.94.5
> (9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43), process ceph-fuse, pid 5822
> ceph-fuse[5822]: starting ceph client
> 2016-02-03 04:55:08.794920 7fe3f7437780 -1 init, newargv = 0x3292e20
> newargc=11
> ceph-fuse[5822]: ceph mount failed with (110) Connection timed out
> 2016-02-03 05:00:08.829498 7fe3e77fe700  0 client.274164 ms_handle_reset on
> 10.1.10.1:6800/2641
>
>
> [root@igc-head ~]# ceph-fuse -d -m igc-head:6789 /mnt/igcfs/
> 2016-02-03 05:00:47.029698 7f1ec270a780  0 ceph version 0.94.5
> (9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43), process ceph-fuse, pid 5939
> ceph-fuse[5939]: starting ceph client
> 2016-02-03 05:00:47.067364 7f1ec270a780 -1 init, newargv = 0x2dd9330
> newargc=11
> ceph-fuse[5939]: ceph mount failed with (110) Connection timed out
> 2016-02-03 05:05:47.100815 7f1eb67fc700  0 client.274125 ms_handle_reset on
> 10.1.10.1:6800/2641
>
> Any log file I should provide here?

If you turn up client debugging to 20 it should output a lot more
information (unless the MDS is returning that error code, which it
might be — in which case, go through all the MDS admin socket commands
and look for something useful, or turn up debugging there). But
realistically, if those 3 inactive PGs are part of your metadata pool,
I presume that's why you're getting errors.
-Greg

>
> Thanks,
> X
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Mykola Dvornik <mykola.dvor...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Try to mount with ceph-fuse. It worked for me when I've faced the same
>> sort of issues you are now dealing with.
>>
>> -Mykola
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Zhao Xu <xuzh....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Mykola. The issue is that I/we strongly suggested to add OSD for
>> many times, but we are not the decision maker.
>> For now, I just want to mount the ceph drive again, even in read only
>> mode, so that they can read the data. Any idea on how to achieve this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> X
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Mykola Dvornik <mykola.dvor...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would strongly(!) suggest you to add few more OSDs to cluster before
>>> things get worse / corrupted.
>>>
>>> -Mykola
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Zhao Xu <xuzh....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>   Recently our ceph storage is running at low performance. Today, we can
>>> not write to the folder. We tried to unmount the ceph storage then to
>>> re-mount it, however, we can not even mount it now:
>>>
>>> # mount -v -t  ceph igc-head,is1,i1,i2,i3:6789:/ /mnt/igcfs/ -o
>>> name=admin,secretfile=/etc/admin.secret
>>> parsing options: rw,name=admin,secretfile=/etc/admin.secret
>>> mount error 5 = Input/output error
>>>
>>>   Previously there are some nearly full osd, so we did the "ceph osd
>>> reweight-by-utilization" to rebalance the usage. The ceph health is not
>>> ideal but it should still alive. Please help me to mount the disk again.
>>>
>>> [root@igc-head ~]# ceph -s
>>>     cluster debdcfe9-20d3-404b-921c-2210534454e1
>>>      health HEALTH_WARN
>>>             39 pgs degraded
>>>             39 pgs stuck degraded
>>>             3 pgs stuck inactive
>>>             332 pgs stuck unclean
>>>             39 pgs stuck undersized
>>>             39 pgs undersized
>>>             48 requests are blocked > 32 sec
>>>             recovery 129755/8053623 objects degraded (1.611%)
>>>             recovery 965837/8053623 objects misplaced (11.993%)
>>>             mds0: Behind on trimming (455/30)
>>>             clock skew detected on mon.i1, mon.i2, mon.i3
>>>      monmap e1: 5 mons at
>>> {i1=10.1.10.11:6789/0,i2=10.1.10.12:6789/0,i3=10.1.10.13:6789/0,igc-head=10.1.10.1:6789/0,is1=10.1.10.100:6789/0}
>>>             election epoch 1314, quorum 0,1,2,3,4 igc-head,i1,i2,i3,is1
>>>      mdsmap e1602: 1/1/1 up {0=igc-head=up:active}
>>>      osdmap e8007: 17 osds: 17 up, 17 in; 298 remapped pgs
>>>       pgmap v5726326: 1088 pgs, 3 pools, 7442 GB data, 2621 kobjects
>>>             22228 GB used, 18652 GB / 40881 GB avail
>>>             129755/8053623 objects degraded (1.611%)
>>>             965837/8053623 objects misplaced (11.993%)
>>>                  755 active+clean
>>>                  293 active+remapped
>>>                   31 active+undersized+degraded
>>>                    5 active+undersized+degraded+remapped
>>>                    3 undersized+degraded+peered
>>>                    1 active+clean+scrubbing
>>>
>>> [root@igc-head ~]# ceph osd tree
>>> ID WEIGHT   TYPE NAME      UP/DOWN REWEIGHT PRIMARY-AFFINITY
>>> -1 39.86992 root default
>>> -2 18.14995     host is1
>>>  0  3.62999         osd.0       up  1.00000          1.00000
>>>  1  3.62999         osd.1       up  1.00000          1.00000
>>>  2  3.62999         osd.2       up  1.00000          1.00000
>>>  3  3.62999         osd.3       up  1.00000          1.00000
>>>  4  3.62999         osd.4       up  1.00000          1.00000
>>> -3  7.23999     host i1
>>>  5  1.81000         osd.5       up  0.44101          1.00000
>>>  6  1.81000         osd.6       up  0.40675          1.00000
>>>  7  1.81000         osd.7       up  0.60754          1.00000
>>>  8  1.81000         osd.8       up  0.50868          1.00000
>>> -4  7.23999     host i2
>>>  9  1.81000         osd.9       up  0.54956          1.00000
>>> 10  1.81000         osd.10      up  0.44815          1.00000
>>> 11  1.81000         osd.11      up  0.53262          1.00000
>>> 12  1.81000         osd.12      up  0.47197          1.00000
>>> -5  7.23999     host i3
>>> 13  1.81000         osd.13      up  0.55557          1.00000
>>> 14  1.81000         osd.14      up  0.65874          1.00000
>>> 15  1.81000         osd.15      up  0.49663          1.00000
>>> 16  1.81000         osd.16      up  0.50136          1.00000
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> X
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to