The docs are already split by version, although it doesn't help that it isn't linked in an obvious manner.
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/cache-tiering/ http://docs.ceph.com/docs/hammer/rados/operations/cache-tiering/ Updating the documentation takes a lot of effort by all involved, and in a project this size, it probably needs a team of people. From what I can tell, all the documentation is in the ceph source tree, and submitting pull requests/tickets is probably a good option to keep it up to date. From my perspective it is also our failure (the users), not updating the docs when we run into issues. -- Adam On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Nigel Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Christian Balzer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Then we come to a typical problem for fast evolving SW like Ceph, things >> that are not present in older versions. > > > I was going to post on this too (I had similar frustrations), and would like > to propose that a move to splitting the documentation by versions: > > OLD > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/cache-tiering/ > > > NEW > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/hammer/rados/operations/cache-tiering/ > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/infernalis/rados/operations/cache-tiering/ > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/jewel/rados/operations/cache-tiering/ > > and so on. > > When a new version is started, the documentation should be 100% cloned and > the tree restructured around the version. It could equally be a drop-down on > the page to select the version. > > Postgres for example uses a similar mechanism: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/ > > Note the version numbers are embedded in the URL. I like their commenting > mechanism too as it provides a running narrative of changes that should be > considered as practice develops around things to do or avoid. > > Once the documentation is cloned for the new version, all the inapplicable > material should be removed and the new features/practice changes should be > added. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
