I'd rather you just scrubbed the same pg with the same osds and the same debugging. -Sam
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote: > Yes, the unfound objects are due to a bug in the repair command. I > suggest you don't repair anything, actually. I don't think any of the > pgs are actually inconsistent. The log I have here is definitely a > case of two objects showing up as inconsistent which are actually > fine. > -Sam > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdo...@umn.edu> wrote: >> I have three more pgs now showing up as inconsistent. Should I turn on >> debug for all OSDs to capture the transition from active+clean -> >> inconsistent? Do I understand correction that the repair cause the >> 'unfound' objects because of a bug in the repair command? >> Regards, >> Jeff >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hmm, so much for that theory, still looking. If you can produce >>> another set of logs (as before) from scrubbing that pg, it might help. >>> -Sam >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdo...@umn.edu> wrote: >>> > they're all the same.....see attached. >>> > >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Have you confirmed the versions? >>> >> -Sam >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdo...@umn.edu> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > I have one other very strange event happening, I've opened a ticket >>> >> > on >>> >> > it: >>> >> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14766 >>> >> > >>> >> > During this migration, OSD failed probably over 400 times while >>> >> > moving >>> >> > data >>> >> > around. We move the empty directories and restarted the OSDs. I >>> >> > can't >>> >> > say if this is related--I have no reason to suspect it is. >>> >> > >>> >> > Jeff >>> >> > >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> What could cause this kind of unexpected behaviour? >>> >> >> Any assumption?? >>> >> >> Sorry for interrupting you. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Cheers, >>> >> >> S >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> > Hmm, at the end of the log, the pg is still inconsistent. Can you >>> >> >> > attach a ceph pg query on that pg? >>> >> >> > -Sam >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >> If so, that strongly suggests that the pg was actually never >>> >> >> >> inconsistent in the first place and that the bug is in scrub >>> >> >> >> itself >>> >> >> >> presumably getting confused about an object during a write. The >>> >> >> >> next >>> >> >> >> step would be to get logs like the above from a pg as it scrubs >>> >> >> >> transitioning from clean to inconsistent. If it's really a race >>> >> >> >> between scrub and a write, it's probably just non-deterministic, >>> >> >> >> you >>> >> >> >> could set logging on a set of osds and continuously scrub any pgs >>> >> >> >> which only map to those osds until you reproduce the problem. >>> >> >> >> -Sam >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> So after the scrub, it came up clean? The inconsistent/missing >>> >> >> >>> objects reappeared? >>> >> >> >>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>> <jmcdo...@umn.edu> >>> >> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>> Hi Sam, >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> I've done as you requested: >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting >>> >> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> # for i in 307 210 273 191 132 450 ; do >>> >> >> >>>>> ceph tell osd.$i injectargs '--debug-osd 20 --debug-filestore >>> >> >> >>>>> 20 >>> >> >> >>>>> --debug-ms 1' >>> >> >> >>>>> done >>> >> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> # date >>> >> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:03:38 CST 2016 >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> # ceph pg deep-scrub 70.459 >>> >> >> >>>> instructing pg 70.459 on osd.307 to deep-scrub >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Scrub finished around >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> # date >>> >> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:13:03 CST 2016 >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> I've tar'd+gziped the files which can be downloaded from here. >>> >> >> >>>> The >>> >> >> >>>> logs >>> >> >> >>>> start a minute or two after today at 16:00. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bzz8TrxFvfema2NQUmotd1BOTnM&usp=sharing >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Oddly(to me anyways), this pg is now active+clean: >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> # ceph pg dump | grep 70.459 >>> >> >> >>>> dumped all in format plain >>> >> >> >>>> 70.459 21377 0 0 0 0 64515446306 3088 3088 active+clean >>> >> >> >>>> 2016-03-07 >>> >> >> >>>> 16:26:57.796537 279563'212832 279602:628151 >>> >> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >>> >> >> >>>> 307 >>> >> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] 307 279563'212832 2016-03-07 >>> >> >> >>>> 16:12:30.741984 >>> >> >> >>>> 279563'212832 2016-03-07 16:12:30.741984 >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Regards, >>> >> >> >>>> Jeff >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> >>>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> I think the unfound object on repair is fixed by >>> >> >> >>>>> d51806f5b330d5f112281fbb95ea6addf994324e (not in hammer yet). >>> >> >> >>>>> I >>> >> >> >>>>> opened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15002 for the backport >>> >> >> >>>>> and >>> >> >> >>>>> to >>> >> >> >>>>> make sure it's covered in ceph-qa-suite. No idea at this time >>> >> >> >>>>> why >>> >> >> >>>>> the >>> >> >> >>>>> objects are disappearing though. >>> >> >> >>>>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> >>>>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> > The one just scrubbed and now inconsistent. >>> >> >> >>>>> > -Sam >>> >> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>>>> > <jmcdo...@umn.edu> >>> >> >> >>>>> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >> Do you want me to enable this for the pg already with >>> >> >> >>>>> >> unfound >>> >> >> >>>>> >> objects >>> >> >> >>>>> >> or the >>> >> >> >>>>> >> placement group just scrubbed and now inconsistent? >>> >> >> >>>>> >> Jeff >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>>>> >> <sj...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> Can you enable >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> debug osd = 20 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> debug filestore = 20 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> debug ms = 1 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> on all osds in that PG, rescrub, and convey to us the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> resulting >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> logs? >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> <jmcdo...@umn.edu> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Here is a PG which just went inconsistent: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > [307,210,273,191,132,450] >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Attached is the result of a pg query on this. I will >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > wait >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > for your >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > feedback before issuing a repair. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > From what I read, the inconsistencies are more likely >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > result of >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > ntp, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > but >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > all nodes have the local ntp master and all are showing >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > sync. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Regards, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeff >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Gregory Farnum >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > <gfar...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> [ Keeping this on the users list. ] >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> Okay, so next time this happens you probably want to do >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> a >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> pg >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> query >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> on >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> the PG which has been reported as dirty. I can't help >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> much >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> beyond >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> that, but hopefully Kefu or David will chime in once >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> there's >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> a >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> little >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> more for them to look at. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> -Greg >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> <jmcdo...@umn.edu> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Hi Greg, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > I'm running the ceph version hammer, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > ceph version 0.94.5 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > (9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > The hardware migration was performed by just setting >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > crush >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > map to >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > zero >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > for the OSD we wanted to retire. The system was >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > performing >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > poorly >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > with >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > these older OSDs and we had a difficult time >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > maintaining >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > stability of >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > system. The old OSDs are still there but all of >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > data >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > is >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > now >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > migrated >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > to new and/or existing hardware. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeff >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Gregory Farnum >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > <gfar...@redhat.com> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> <jmcdo...@umn.edu> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Hi, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > For a while, we've been seeing inconsistent >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > placement >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > groups >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > on >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > our >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > erasure >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > coded system. The placement groups go from a >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > of >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean+inconsistent after a deep scrub: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044131 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub stat mismatch, got 21446/21428 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 hit_set_archive, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 hit_set_archive >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044416 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub 18 missing, 0 inconsistent >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044464 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 deep-scrub 73 errors >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > So I tell the placement group to perform a repair: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:26.047177 7f385d118700 0 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [INF] : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair starts >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:57.087291 7f3858b0a700 0 -- >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.2:6874/13937 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.6:6824/8127 pipe(0x2e578000 sd=697 :6874 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The repair finds missing shards and repairs them, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > but >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > then I >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > have >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 'unfound objects' : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.467590 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair stat mismatch, got 21446/21428 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 hit_set_archive, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 hit_set_archive >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.468358 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair 18 missing, 0 inconsistent objects >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.469431 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair 73 errors, 73 fixed >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've traced one of the unfound objects all the way >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > through the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've found that they are not really lost. I can >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > fail >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > over >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > osd >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recover the files. This is happening quite >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > regularly >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > after a >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > large >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > migration of data from old hardware to >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > new(migration >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > is >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > complete). >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The system sets the PG into 'recovery', but we've >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > seen >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > in >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > a >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recovering state for many days. Should we just >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > be >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > patient >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or do >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > need >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to dig further into the issue? >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> You may need to dig into this more, although I'm not >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> sure >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> what >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> issue is likely to be. What version of Ceph are you >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> running? How >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> did >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> you do this hardware migration? >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> -Greg >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is stuck unclean for 704.803040, current >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+recovering, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > last acting [277,101,218,49,304,412] >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is active+recovering, acting >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [277,101,218,49,304,412], >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > unfound >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > There is no indication of any problems with down >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > network >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > issues >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > with >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs. >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Thanks, >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeff >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > -- >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users mailing list >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> -- >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>>>> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>>>> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>>>> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>>>> >> 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>>>> >> jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >>> >> >> >>>>> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>>>> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> -- >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>>> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>>> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>>> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>>> 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>>> jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >>> >> >> >>>> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>>> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list >>> >> >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> Email: >>> >> >> shin...@linux.com >>> >> >> GitHub: >>> >> >> shinobu-x >>> >> >> Blog: >>> >> >> Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > >>> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >>> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> > >>> > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
