Ceph-deploy suite and also selinux suite(which isn't merged yet) indirectly
tests ceph-disk and has been run on Jewel as well. I guess the issue
Stephen is seeing is on multipath device
which I believe is a known issue.

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfar...@redhat.com> wrote:

> There's a ceph-disk suite from last August that Loïc set up, but based
> on the qa list it wasn't running for a while and isn't in great shape.
> :/ I know there are some CentOS7 boxes in the sepia lab but it might
> not be enough for a small and infrequently-run test to reliably get
> tested against them.
> -Greg
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Ben Hines <bhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It seems like ceph-disk is often breaking on centos/redhat systems. Does
> it
> > have automated tests in the ceph release structure?
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Stephen Lord <steve.l...@quantum.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The ceph-disk (10.0.4 version) command seems to have problems operating
> on
> >> a Redhat 7 system, it uses the partprobe command unconditionally to
> update
> >> the partition table, I had to change this to partx -u to get past this.
> >>
> >> @@ -1321,13 +1321,13 @@
> >>      processed, i.e. the 95-ceph-osd.rules actions and mode changes,
> >>      group changes etc. are complete.
> >>      """
> >> -    LOG.debug('Calling partprobe on %s device %s', description, dev)
> >> +    LOG.debug('Calling partx on %s device %s', description, dev)
> >>      partprobe_ok = False
> >>      error = 'unknown error'
> >>      for i in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5):
> >>          command_check_call(['udevadm', 'settle', '--timeout=600'])
> >>          try:
> >> -            _check_output(['partprobe', dev])
> >> +            _check_output(['partx', '-u', dev])
> >>              partprobe_ok = True
> >>              break
> >>          except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
> >>
> >>
> >> It really needs to be doing that conditional on the operating system
> >> version.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> The information contained in this transmission may be confidential. Any
> >> disclosure, copying, or further distribution of confidential
> information is
> >> not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by
> >> Quantum. Quantum reserves the right to have electronic communications,
> >> including email and attachments, sent across its networks filtered
> through
> >> anti virus and spam software programs and retain such messages in order
> to
> >> comply with applicable data security and retention requirements.
> Quantum is
> >> not responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the
> substance of
> >> this communication or for any delay in its receipt.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ceph-users mailing list
> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to