Hi Reddy, It's over a thousand lines, I pasted it on gist: https://gist.github.com/dotSlashLu/22623b4cefa06a46e0d4
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 at 18:15 M Ranga Swami Reddy <swamire...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Can you please share the "ceph health detail" output? > > Thanks > Swami > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Zhang Qiang <dotslash...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have 20 OSDs and 1 pool, and, as recommended by the > > doc(http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/placement-groups/), > I > > configured pg_num and pgp_num to 4096, size 2, min size 1. > > > > But ceph -s shows: > > > > HEALTH_WARN > > 534 pgs degraded > > 551 pgs stuck unclean > > 534 pgs undersized > > too many PGs per OSD (382 > max 300) > > > > Why the recommended value, 4096, for 10 ~ 50 OSDs doesn't work? And what > > does it mean by "too many PGs per OSD (382 > max 300)"? If per OSD has > 382 > > PGs I would have had 7640 PGs. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
