On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:22:45AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote: > On 23/03/2016 01:12, Chris Dunlop wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:06AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> On 23/03/2016 00:39, Chris Dunlop wrote: >>>> "The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian >>>> wheezy. It would be quite surprising and unexpected to drop support for an >>>> OS in the middle of a stable series. >>> >>> I'm unsure if wheezy is among the old OS'es. It predates my involvement in >>> the stable releases effort. I know for sure el6 and 12.04 are supported for >>> 0.94.x. >> >> From http://download.ceph.com/debian-hammer/pool/main/c/ceph/ >> >> ceph-common_0.94.1-1~bpo70+1_i386.deb 15-Dec-2015 15:32 >> 10217628 >> ceph-common_0.94.3-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 19-Oct-2015 18:54 >> 9818964 >> ceph-common_0.94.4-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 26-Oct-2015 20:48 >> 9868020 >> ceph-common_0.94.5-1~bpo70+1_amd64.deb 15-Dec-2015 15:32 >> 9868188 >> >> That's all debian wheezy. >> >> (Huh. I'd never noticed 0.94.1 was i386 only!) >> > > Indeed. Were these packages created as a lucky side effect or because there > was a commitment at some point ? I'm curious to know the answer as well :-)
Who would know? Sage? (cc'ed) Chris _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
