> On 14 Apr 2016, at 00:09, Gregory Farnum <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Sage Weil <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> The third (and likely final) Jewel release candidate is out. We have a >> very small number of remaining blocker issues and a bit of final polish >> before we publish Jewel 10.2.0, probably next week. >> >> There are no known issues with this release that are serious enough to >> warn about here. Greg is adding some CephFS checks so that admins don't >> accidentally start using less-stable features, > > s/is adding/has added/ > >> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/release-notes/ > > As noted in another thread, there's still a big CephFS warning in the > online docs. We'll be cleaning those up, since we now have the > recovery tools we desire! Some things are known to still be slow or > sub-optimal, but we consider CephFS stable and safe at this time when > run in the default single-MDS configuration. (It won't let you do > anything bad without very explicitly setting flags and acknowledging > they're dangerous.) > :) > -Greg > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Hi Greg, A clarification: When you say that things will be safe in “single-MDS” configuration, do you also exclude the HA setup with one active MDS and some passive (standby) ones? Or this would be safe as well? Vincenzo Pii | TERALYTICS DevOps Engineer
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
