For a new cluster, it still missing this udev rules https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/35004a628b2969d8b2f1c02155bb235165a1d809
but it's not a problem on existing cluster, as the old udev rules till exist I think. Anyway, you can copy it manually. I'm running jewel without any problem since 3 week now, on 2 different cluster. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Shain Miley" <[email protected]> À: "Zoltan Arnold Nagy" <[email protected]>, "ceph-users" <[email protected]> Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Juillet 2016 16:32:51 Objet: Re: [ceph-users] is it time already to move from hammer to jewel? +1 on looking for some thoughts on this. We are in the same boat and looking for some guidance as well. Thanks, Shain On 07/06/2016 01:47 PM, Zoltan Arnold Nagy wrote: > Hey, > > Those out there who are running production clusters: have you upgraded > already to Jewel? > I usually wait until .2 is out (which it is now for Jewel) but just looking > for largish deployment experiences in the field before I pull the trigger > over the weekend. It’s a largish upgrade going from ~460TB to 1.2PB and at > this point I’m just overly cautious. > > One of the main reasons I want to upgrade to is to get the new IO queuing > code so the recovery ops won’t hit the VM workloads (that much). (Yes, we > have it configured properly, but even one backfill is visible in our client > IO…) > Other than that I’m happy with hammer. > > Cheers, > Zoltan > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- NPR | Shain Miley | Manager of Infrastructure, Digital Media | [email protected] | 202.513.3649 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
