Hi, Just wonder why you want each OSD inside separate LXC container? Just to pin them to specific cpus?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Guillaume Comte < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently defining a storage architecture based on ceph, and i wish > to know if i don't misunderstood some stuffs. > > So, i plan to deploy for each HDD of each servers as much as OSD as free > harddrive, each OSD will be inside a LXC container. > > Then, i wish to turn the server itself as a rbd client for objects created > in the pools, i wish also to have a SSD to activate caching (and also store > osd logs as well) > > The idea behind is to create CRUSH rules which will maintain a set of > object within a couple of servers connected to the same pair of switch in > order to have the best proximity between where i store the object and where > i use them (i don't bother having a very high insurance to not loose data > if my whole rack powerdown) > > Am i already on the wrong track ? Is there a way to guaranty proximity of > data with ceph whitout making twisted configuration as i am ready to do ? > > Thks in advance, > > Regards > -- > *Guillaume Comte* > 06 25 85 02 02 | [email protected] > <[email protected]> > 90 avenue des Ternes, 75 017 Paris > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > -- Łukasz Jagiełło lukasz<at>jagiello<dot>org
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
