i fully agree.
If the downtime is related to a problem with a ceph cluster, it should
be very intresting to anyone of us, what happend to this ceph cluster to
cause a downtime of multiple days.
Usually thats quiet long for a productive usage.
So any information with some details is highly appriciated. I assume
that who ever run the ceph cluster knows how ceph works. So its even
more important to know what was going wrong, so this can be considered.
Thank you !
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards
IP Interactive UG ( haftungsbeschraenkt )
Zum Sonnenberg 1-3
HRB 93402 beim Amtsgericht Hanau
Geschäftsführung: Oliver Dzombic
Steuer Nr.: 35 236 3622 1
UST ID: DE274086107
Am 13.10.2016 um 12:46 schrieb Henrik Korkuc:
> from status page it seems that Ceph didn't like networking problems. May
> we find out some details what happened? Underprovisioned servers (RAM
> upgrades were in there too)? Too much load on disks? Something else?
> This situation may be not pleasant but I feel that others can learn from
> it to prevent such situations in the future.
> On 16-10-13 06:55, Dan Mick wrote:
>> Everything should have been back some time ago (0000 UTC or thereabouts)
>> On 10/11/2016 10:41 PM, Brian :: wrote:
>>> Looks like they are having major challenges getting that ceph cluster
>>> running again.. Still down.
>>> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016, Ken Dreyer <kdre...@redhat.com
>>> <mailto:kdre...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>> I think this may be related:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Sean Redmond <sean.redmo...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:sean.redmo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Looks like the ceph website and related sub domains are giving
>>>>> errors for
>>>>> the last few hours.
>>>>> I noticed the below that I use are in scope.
>> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users mailing list