Hi John, Thanks that makes sense... So I take it if I use the same IP for the bond, I shouldn't run into the issues I ran into last night?
Cheers, Mike On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:55 AM, John Petrini <jpetr...@coredial.com> wrote: > For redundancy I would suggest bonding the interfaces using LACP that way > both ports are combined under the same interface with the same IP. They > will both send and receive traffic and if one link goes down the other > continues to work. The ports will need to be configured for LACP on the > switch as well. > > ___ > > John Petrini > > NOC Systems Administrator // *CoreDial, LLC* // coredial.com > // [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/coredial> [image: > LinkedIn] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/99631> [image: Google Plus] > <https://plus.google.com/104062177220750809525/posts> [image: Blog] > <http://success.coredial.com/blog> > Hillcrest I, 751 Arbor Way, Suite 150, Blue Bell PA, 19422 > *P: *215.297.4400 x232 // *F: *215.297.4401 // *E: * > jpetr...@coredial.com > > [image: Exceptional people. Proven Processes. Innovative Technology. > Discover CoreDial - watch our video] > <http://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/210539/4c492538-6e4b-445e-9480-bef676787085> > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any > computer. > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Mike Jacobacci <mi...@flowjo.com> wrote: > >> I ran into an interesting issue last night when I tried to add a second >> storage interface. The original 10gb storage interface on the OSD node was >> only set at 1500 MTU, so the plan was to bump it to 9000 and configure the >> second interface the same way with a diff IP and reboot. Once I did that, >> for some reason the original interface showed active but would not respond >> to ping from the other OSD nodes, the second interface I added came up and >> was reachable. So even though the node could still communicate to the >> others on the second interface, PG's would start remapping and would get >> stuck at about 300 (of 1024). I resolved the issue by changing the config >> back on the original interface and disabling the second. After a Reboot, >> PG's recovered very quickly. >> >> It seemed that the remapping would only go partially because the first >> node could reach the others, but they couldn't reach the original interface >> and didn't use the newly added second. So for my questions: >> >> Is there a proper way to add an additional interface (for redundancy) to >> the storage network so that it's recognized by the cluster? >> >> If IPV6 is enabled on a storage interface when the cluster was created, >> would it be a problem to disable it now? >> >> Cheers, >> Mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
