We have a very similar configuration at one point. I was fairly new when we started to move away from it, but what happened to us is that anytime a directory needed to stat, backup, ls, rsync, etc. It would take minutes to return and while it was waiting CPU load would spike due to iowait. The difference between what you've said and what we did was that we used a gateway machine, the actual cluster never had any issues with it. This was also on infernalis so things probably have changed in Jewel and Kraken.
Regards, Logan ----- On Feb 21, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Rhian Resnick <[email protected]> wrote: | Good morning, | We are currently investigating using Ceph for a KVM farm, block storage and | possibly file systems (cephfs with ceph-fuse, and ceph hadoop). Our cluster | will be composed of 4 nodes, ~240 OSD's, and 4 monitors providing mon and mds | as required. | What experience has the community had with large numbers of files in a single | directory (500,000 - 5 million). We know that directory fragmentation will be | required but are concerned about the stability of the implementation. | Your opinions and suggestions are welcome. | Thank you | Rhian Resnick | Assistant Director Middleware and HPC | Office of Information Technology | Florida Atlantic University | 777 Glades Road, CM22, Rm 173B | Boca Raton, FL 33431 | Phone 561.297.2647 | Fax 561.297.0222 | _______________________________________________ | ceph-users mailing list | [email protected] | http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
