>From this extract from pg query:

"up": [
                    11,
                    10,
                    84,
                    83,
                    22,
                    26,
                    69,
                    72,
                    53,
                    59,
                    8,
                    4,
                    46
                ],
                "acting": [
                    2147483647,
                    2147483647,
                    84,
                    83,
                    22,
                    26,
                    69,
                    72,
                    53,
                    59,
                    8,
                    4,
                    46

I am wondering if there is an issue on 11 , 10 causing the current active 
primary "acting_primar": 84" to crash.

But can't see anything that could be causing it.

,Ashley

From: Ashley Merrick
Sent: 01 June 2017 23:39
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: PG Stuck EC Pool

Have attached the full pg query for the effected PG encase this shows anything 
of interest.

Thanks

From: ceph-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ashley 
Merrick
Sent: 01 June 2017 17:19
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [ceph-users] PG Stuck EC Pool


This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear to 
be. Learn about spoofing<http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing>

Feedback<http://aka.ms/SafetyTipsFeedback>


Have a PG which is stuck in this state (Is an EC with K=10 M=3)





pg 6.14 is active+undersized+degraded+remapped+inconsistent+backfilling, acting 
[2147483647,2147483647,84,83,22,26,69,72,53,59,8,4,46]



Currently have no-recover set, if I unset no recover both OSD 83 + 84 start to 
flap and go up and down, I see the following in the log's of the OSD.



*****
    -5> 2017-06-01 10:08:29.658593 7f430ec97700  1 -- 172.16.3.14:6806/5204 <== 
osd.17 172.16.3.3:6806/2006016 57 ==== MOSDECSubOpWriteReply(6.31as0 71513 
ECSubWriteReply(tid=152, last_complete=0'0, committed=0, applied=1)) v1 ==== 
67+0+0 (245959818 0 0) 0x563c9db7be00 con 0x563c9cfca480
    -4> 2017-06-01 10:08:29.658620 7f430ec97700  5 -- op tracker -- seq: 2367, 
time: 2017-06-01 10:08:29.658620, event: queued_for_pg, op: 
MOSDECSubOpWriteReply(6.31as0 71513 ECSubWriteReply(tid=152, last_complete=0'0, 
committed=0, applied=1))
    -3> 2017-06-01 10:08:29.658649 7f4319e11700  5 -- op tracker -- seq: 2367, 
time: 2017-06-01 10:08:29.658649, event: reached_pg, op: 
MOSDECSubOpWriteReply(6.31as0 71513 ECSubWriteReply(tid=152, last_complete=0'0, 
committed=0, applied=1))
    -2> 2017-06-01 10:08:29.658661 7f4319e11700  5 -- op tracker -- seq: 2367, 
time: 2017-06-01 10:08:29.658660, event: done, op: 
MOSDECSubOpWriteReply(6.31as0 71513 ECSubWriteReply(tid=152, last_complete=0'0, 
committed=0, applied=1))
    -1> 2017-06-01 10:08:29.663107 7f43320ec700  5 -- op tracker -- seq: 2317, 
time: 2017-06-01 10:08:29.663107, event: sub_op_applied, op: 
osd_op(osd.79.66617:8675008 6.82058b1a rbd_data.e5208a238e1f29.0000000000025f3e 
[copy-from ver 4678410] snapc 0=[] 
ondisk+write+ignore_overlay+enforce_snapc+known_if_redirected e71513)
     0> 2017-06-01 10:08:29.663474 7f4319610700 -1 *** Caught signal (Aborted) 
**
 in thread 7f4319610700 thread_name:tp_osd_recov

 ceph version 10.2.7 (50e863e0f4bc8f4b9e31156de690d765af245185)
 1: (()+0x9564a7) [0x563c6a6f24a7]
 2: (()+0xf890) [0x7f4342308890]
 3: (gsignal()+0x37) [0x7f434034f067]
 4: (abort()+0x148) [0x7f4340350448]
 5: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char 
const*)+0x256) [0x563c6a7f83d6]
 6: (ReplicatedPG::recover_replicas(int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x62f) 
[0x563c6a2850ff]
 7: (ReplicatedPG::start_recovery_ops(int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&, int*)+0xa8a) 
[0x563c6a2b878a]
 8: (OSD::do_recovery(PG*, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x36d) [0x563c6a131bbd]
 9: (ThreadPool::WorkQueue<PG>::_void_process(void*, 
ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x1d) [0x563c6a17c88d]
 10: (ThreadPool::worker(ThreadPool::WorkThread*)+0xa9f) [0x563c6a7e8e3f]
 11: (ThreadPool::WorkThread::entry()+0x10) [0x563c6a7e9d70]
 12: (()+0x8064) [0x7f4342301064]
 13: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f434040262d]
 NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to 
interpret this.
*****




What should my next steps be?



Thanks!
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to