On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:08 AM Jake Grimmett <j...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
> Many thanks for your reply.
>
> I couldn't see an obvious cephx permission error, as I can issue other
> admin commands from this node.
>
> However, I agree that this is probably the issue; disabling cephx (auth
> to none) enabled me to repair the pgs, and gain a clean HEALTH report.
>

Yeah, you probably need to get a
caps mgr = "allow *"
stanza in your admin client's permissions. The default tooling should all
be doing that now, but there may be some holes and an upgraded cluster
won't do it. See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20296 for more details.
-Greg


>
> thanks again,
>
> Jake
>
>
> On 13/06/17 18:02, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> > What are the cephx permissions of the key you are using to issue repair
> > commands?
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:31 AM Jake Grimmett <j...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
> > <mailto:j...@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>> wrote:
> >
> >     Dear All,
> >
> >     I'm testing Luminous and have a problem repairing inconsistent pgs.
> This
> >     occurs with v12.0.2 and is still present with v12.0.3-1507-g52f0deb
> >
> >     # ceph health
> >     HEALTH_ERR noout flag(s) set; 2 pgs inconsistent; 2 scrub errors
> >
> >     # ceph health detail
> >     HEALTH_ERR noout flag(s) set; 2 pgs inconsistent; 2 scrub errors
> >     noout flag(s) set
> >     pg 2.3 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [53,50]
> >     pg 2.11 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [52,50]
> >     2 scrub errors
> >
> >     #  rados list-inconsistent-pg hotpool
> >     ["2.3","2.11"]
> >
> >     # rados list-inconsistent-obj 2.3 --format=json-pretty
> >     No scrub information available for pg 2.3
> >     error 2: (2) No such file or directory
> >
> >     # ceph pg repair 2.3
> >     Error EACCES: access denied
> >
> >     # ceph pg scrub 2.3
> >     Error EACCES: access denied
> >
> >     # ceph pg repair 2.11
> >     Error EACCES: access denied
> >
> >     I'm using bluestore OSD's on Scientific Linux 7.3
> >
> >     Any ideas what might be the problem?
> >
> >     thanks,
> >
> >     Jake
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     ceph-users mailing list
> >     ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
> >     http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to