Apologies, corrected second link:
http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2017-March/016663.html

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Brian Andrus <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Please see the following mailing list topics that have covered this topic
> in detail:
>
> "2x replication: A BIG warning":
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg32915.html
>
> "replica questions":
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg32915.html
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ian Bobbitt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm working on the specifications for a very small Ceph cluster for VM
>> images (OpenStack/QEMU-KVM/etc).
>>
>> I'm being asked to justify sticking with the default redundancy levels
>> (size=3, min_size=2) rather than dropping them to
>> size=2, min_size=1.
>>
>> Can someone help me articulate why we should be keeping 3 copies, beyond
>> "it's the default"?
>>
>> -- Ian
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Brian Andrus | Cloud Systems Engineer | DreamHost
> [email protected] | www.dreamhost.com
>



-- 
Brian Andrus | Cloud Systems Engineer | DreamHost
[email protected] | www.dreamhost.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to