Apologies, corrected second link: http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2017-March/016663.html
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Brian Andrus <[email protected]> wrote: > Please see the following mailing list topics that have covered this topic > in detail: > > "2x replication: A BIG warning": > https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg32915.html > > "replica questions": > https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg32915.html > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ian Bobbitt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm working on the specifications for a very small Ceph cluster for VM >> images (OpenStack/QEMU-KVM/etc). >> >> I'm being asked to justify sticking with the default redundancy levels >> (size=3, min_size=2) rather than dropping them to >> size=2, min_size=1. >> >> Can someone help me articulate why we should be keeping 3 copies, beyond >> "it's the default"? >> >> -- Ian >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> > > > -- > Brian Andrus | Cloud Systems Engineer | DreamHost > [email protected] | www.dreamhost.com > -- Brian Andrus | Cloud Systems Engineer | DreamHost [email protected] | www.dreamhost.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
