Hi David, thanks for quick feedback. Then why some PGs were remapped and some were not?
# LOOKS THAT 338 PGs IN ERASURE CODED POOLS HAVE BEEN REMAPPED # I DONT GET WHY 540 PGs STILL ENCOUNTER active+undersized+degraded STATE root at host01 <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>:~# ceph pg dump pgs_brief |grep 'active+remapped' dumped pgs_brief in format plain 16.6f active+remapped [43,2147483647 <(214)%20748-3647>,2,31,12] 43 [43,33,2,31,12] 43 16.6e active+remapped [10,5,35,44,2147483647] 10 [10,5,35,44,41] 10 ....root at host01 <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>:~# egrep '16.6f|16.6e' PGs_on_HOST_host05 16.6f active+clean [43,33,2,59,12] 43 [43,33,2,59,12] 43 16.6e active+clean [10,5,49,35,41] 10 [10,5,49,35,41] 10root at host01 <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>:~# like PG 16.6f, prior to ceph services stop it was on [43,33,2,59,12] then was remapped to [43,33,2,31,12], so OSD@31 and OSD@33 are on the same HOST. But for example PG 16.ee get to active+undersized+degraded state, prior to services stop it was on pg_stat state up up_primary acting acting_primary 16.ee active+clean [5,22,33,55,45] 5 [5,22,33,55,45] 5 after the stop of services on the host it was not remapped 16.ee active+undersized+degraded [5,22,33,2147483647 <(214)%20748-3647>,45] 5 [5,22,33,2147483647 <(214)%20748-3647>,45] 5
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
