On 01/22/2018 08:38 PM, Massimiliano Cuttini wrote: > The web interface is needed because:*cmd-lines are prune to typos.* And you never misclick, indeed;
> SMART is widely used. SMART has never, and will never be any useful for failure prediction. > My opinion is pretty simple: the more a software is complex the more > you'll be prune to errors. As you said, "from great power comes great costs". Ceph is not for dummies (albeit installing and maintening a running cluster is pretty straighforward). > A web interface can just make the basics checks before submitting a new > command to the pool. And the command line does exactly the same. Try removing a pool, you will see. MMI's are the same : if errors can be prevented, they shall. To prevent all errors, you must remove all functionnalities. > To say "/ceph is not for rookies, //it's better having a threshold"/ can > be said only from a person that really don't love it's own data (keeping > management as error free as possible), but instead just want to be the > only one allowed to manage them. Yeah, well, whatever, most system engineers know how to handle Ceph. Most non-system engineers do not. A task, a job, I don't master other's job, hence it feels natural that others do not master mine. Sorry if this sound so strange to you. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
