Hi Bryan, Thank you for the reply.
We are on Hammer, ceph version 0.94.9 (fe6d859066244b97b24f09d46552afc2071e6f90) We tried with full weight on all OSDs on that node and the OSDs like 611 are going above 90% so downsized and tested with only 0.2 Our PGs are at 119 for all 12 pools in the cluster. We are using tree algorithm for our clusters. We deleted and re-added the OSDs and still the same issue. Not sure if upgrading the cluster might fix it but we are afraid of upgrading the cluster, hoping for a fix without upgrading. Thanks, Pardhiv K On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Bryan Stillwell <bstillw...@godaddy.com> wrote: > > We have a large 1PB ceph cluster. We recently added 6 nodes with 16 2TB > disks > > each to the cluster. All the 5 nodes rebalanced well without any issues > and > > the sixth/last node OSDs started acting weird as I increase weight of > one osd > > the utilization doesn't change but a different osd on the same node > > utilization is getting increased. Rebalance complete fine but > utilization is > > not right. > > > > Increased weight of OSD 610 to 0.2 from 0.0 but utilization of OSD 611 > > started increasing but its weight is 0.0. If I increase weight of OSD > 611 to > > 0.2 then its overall utilization is growing to what if its weight is > 0.4. So > > if I increase weight of 610 and 615 to their full weight then > utilization on > > OSD 610 is 1% and on OSD 611 is inching towards 100% where I had to stop > and > > downsize the OSD's crush weight back to 0.0 to avoid any implications on > ceph > > cluster. Its not just one osd but different OSD's on that one node. The > only > > correlation I found out is 610 and 611 OSD Journal partitions are on the > same > > SSD drive and all the OSDs are SAS drives. Any help on how to debug or > > resolve this will be helpful. > > You didn't say which version of Ceph you were using, but based on the > output > of 'ceph osd df' I'm guessing it's pre-Jewel (maybe Hammer?) cluster? > > I've found that data placement can be a little weird when you have really > low CRUSH weights (0.2) on one of the nodes where the other nodes have > large > CRUSH weights (2.0). I've had it where a single OSD in a node was getting > almost all the data. It wasn't until I increased the weights to be more in > line with the rest of the cluster that it evened back out. > > I believe this can also be caused by not having enough PGs in your cluster. > Or the PGs you do have aren't distributed correctly based on the data usage > in each pool. Have you used https://ceph.com/pgcalc/ to determine the > correct number of PGs you should have per pool? > > Since you are likely running a pre-Jewel cluster it could also be that you > haven't switched your tunables to use the straw2 data placement algorithm: > > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/crush- > map/#hammer-crush-v4 > > That should help as well. Once that's enabled you can convert your > existing > buckets to straw2 as well. Just be careful you don't have any old clients > connecting to your cluster that don't support that feature yet. > > Bryan > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > -- *Pardhiv Karri* "Rise and Rise again until LAMBS become LIONS"
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
