Thank you all My goal is to have an SSD based Ceph ( NVME + SSD) cluster so I need to consider performance as well as reliability ( although I do realize that a performant cluster that breaks my VMware is not ideal ;-))
It appears that NFS is the safe way to do it but will it be the bottleneck from performance perspective Anyone did a comparison between iSCSI and NFS ? Would network be a bottleneck ? Many thanks Steven On Tue, 29 May 2018 at 11:04, Dennis Benndorf < dennis.bennd...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we use PetaSAN for our VMWare-Cluster. It provides an webinterface for > management and does clustered active-active ISCSI. For us the easy > management was the point to choose this, so we need not to think about how > to configure ISCSI... > Regards, > Dennis > > Am 28.05.2018 um 21:42 schrieb Steven Vacaroaia: > > Hi, > > I need to design and build a storage platform that will be "consumed" > mainly by VMWare > > CEPH is my first choice > > As far as I can see, there are 3 ways CEPH storage can be made available > to VMWare > > 1. iSCSI > 2. NFS-Ganesha > 3. mounted rbd to a lInux NFS server > > Any suggestions / advice as to which one is better ( and why) as well as > links to doumentation/best practices will be truly appreciated > > Thanks > Steven > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing > listceph-us...@lists.ceph.comhttp://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
