Hi Steven,

 

If you are running OSDs on the SD card, there would be nothing technically 
stopping this setup, but the main factors against would be the simple endurance 
and performance of SD cards and the potential fallout when they inevitably 
fail. If you factor time and maintenance as a cost just as much as the 
hardware, you would be far better off getting a small NVME drive as mentioned. 
With regarding to booting from the NVME, I don’t know the answer to that 
unfortunately as we don’t use R620’s (our preference is the Dell 730XD), but 
I’ll check with some of our DC to see if they have that info to hand and let 
you know.

 

In my view, keep OS activity entirely separate from OSD operations too. Mixing 
the two can introduce a host of other problems which will cause a lot of pain 
along the way, such as receiving a hanging messages from the kernel trying to 
perform OS writes if the osd process is in a full recovery state. Always 
account for your failure redundancy in the worst case scenario and not the 
ideal one, I found this out personally on a very large cluster and is not a fun 
experience.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Tom

 

From: ceph-users <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steven 
Vacaroaia
Sent: 13 August 2018 19:53
To: ceph-users <[email protected]>
Subject: [ceph-users] limited disk slots - should I ran OS on SD card ?

 

Hi,

 

I am in the process of deploying CEPPH mimic on a few DELL R620/630 servers

These servers have only 8 disk slots and the larger disk they accept is 2 TB 

 

Should I share a SSD drive between OS and WAL/DB or ran OS on internal SD cards 
and dedicated SSD to DB/WAL only ?

 

Another option is to use NVME ( can still get  DC P3700) but not sure if DELL 
R620 allows booting from it 

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated 

 

I am still waiting for budget approval to buy disks

In my small test environment  I did not notice any performance hit when OS was 
on SD card

 

Many thanks

Steven

 

 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to