On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM Vikas Rana <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> on Primary site, we have OSD's running on 192.168.4.x address.
>
> Similarly on Secondary site, we have OSD's running on 192.168.4.x address. 
> 192.168.3.x is the old MON network.on both site which was non route-able.
> So we renamed mon on primary site to 165.x.x and mon on secondary site to 
> 165.x.y. now primary and secondary can see each other.
>
>
> Do the OSD daemon from primary and secondary have to talk to each other? we 
> have same non routed networks for OSD.

The secondary site needs to be able to communicate with all MON and
OSD daemons in the primary site.

> Thanks,
> -Vikas
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:13 AM Jason Dillaman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:10 AM Vikas Rana <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Jason for great suggestions.
>> >
>> > but somehow rbd mirror status not working from secondary to primary. 
>> > Here;s the status from both sides. cluster name is ceph on primary side 
>> > and cephdr on remote site. mirrordr is the user on DR side and mirrorprod 
>> > is on primary prod side.
>> >
>> > # rbd mirror pool info nfs
>> > Mode: image
>> > Peers:
>> >   UUID                                 NAME   CLIENT
>> >   3ccd7a67-2343-44bf-960b-02d9b1258371 cephdr client.mirrordr.
>> >
>> > rbd --cluster cephdr mirror pool info nfs
>> > Mode: image
>> > Peers:
>> >   UUID                                 NAME CLIENT
>> >   e6b9ba05-48de-462c-ad5f-0b51d0ee733f ceph client.mirrorprod
>> >
>> >
>> > From primary site, when i query the remote site, its looks good.
>> > # rbd --cluster cephdr --id mirrordr mirror pool status nfs
>> > health: OK
>> > images: 0 total
>> >
>> > but when i query from secondary site to primary side, I'm getting this 
>> > error
>> > # rbd  --cluster ceph --id mirrorprod mirror pool status nfs
>> > 2018-10-03 10:21:06.645903 7f27a44ed700  0 -- 165.x.x.202:0/1310074448 >> 
>> > 192.168.3.21:6804/3835 pipe(0x55ed47daf480 sd=4 :0 s=1 pgs=0 cs=0 l=1 
>> > c=0x55ed47db0740).fault
>> >
>> >
>> > We were using 192.168.3.x for MON network before we renamed it to use 165 
>> > address since its routeable. why its trying to connect to 192.x address 
>> > instead of 165.x.y address?
>>
>> Are your OSDs on that 192.168.3.x subnet? What daemons are running on
>> 192.168.3.21?
>>
>> > I could do ceph -s from both side and they can see each other. Only rbd 
>> > command is having issue.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -Vikas
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:14 PM Jason Dillaman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:47 PM Vikas Rana <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > We have a CEPH 3 node cluster at primary site. We created a RBD image 
>> >> > and the image has about 100TB of data.
>> >> >
>> >> > Now we installed another 3 node cluster on secondary site. We want to 
>> >> > replicate the image at primary site to this new cluster on secondary 
>> >> > site.
>> >> >
>> >> > As per documentation, we enabled journaling on primary site. We 
>> >> > followed all the procedure and peering looks good but the image is not 
>> >> > copying.
>> >> > The status is always showing down.
>> >>
>> >> Do you have an "rbd-mirror" daemon running on the secondary site? Are
>> >> you running "rbd mirror pool status" against the primary site or the
>> >> secondary site? The mirroring status is only available on the sites
>> >> running "rbd-mirror" daemon (the "down" means that the cluster you are
>> >> connected to doesn't have the daemon running).
>> >>
>> >> > So my question is, is it possible to replicate a image which already 
>> >> > have some data before enabling journalling?
>> >>
>> >> Indeed -- it will perform a full image sync to the secondary site.
>> >>
>> >> > We are using the image mirroring instead of pool mirroring. Do we need 
>> >> > to create the RBD image on secondary site? As per documentation, its 
>> >> > not required.
>> >>
>> >> The only difference between the two modes is whether or not you need
>> >> to run "rbd mirror image enable" or not.
>> >>Nit: same comment -- can we drop the ```max_data_area_mb``` parameter?
>> >> > Is there any other option to copy the image to the remote site?
>> >>
>> >> No other procedure should be required.
>> >>
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > -Vikas
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > ceph-users mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jason
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jason



-- 
Jason
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to