Hi,

same here but also for pgs in cephfs pools.

As far as I know there is a known bug that under memory pressure some reads 
return zero
and this will lead to the error message.

I have set nodeep-scrub and i am waiting for 12.2.11.

Thanks
  Christoph

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 03:23:21PM +0100, Hervé Ballans wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> 
> I encounter exactly the same issue with the same disks than yours. Every
> day, after a batch of deep scrubbing operation, ther are generally between 1
> and 3 inconsistent pgs, and that, on different OSDs.
> 
> It could confirm a problem on these disks, but :
> 
> - it concerns only the pgs of the rbd pool, not those of cephfs pools (the
> same disk model is used)
> 
> - I encounter this when I was running 12.2.5, not when I upgraded in 12.2.8
> but the problem appears again after upgrade in 12.2.10
> 
> - On my side, smartctl and dmesg do not show any media error, so I'm pretty
> sure that physical media is not concerned...
> 
> Small precision: each disk is configured with RAID0 on a PERC740P, is this
> also the case for you or are your disks in JBOD mode ?
> 
> Another question: in your case, the OSD who is involved in the inconsistent
> pgs is it always the same one or is it a new one every time ?
> 
> For information, currently, the manually 'ceph pg repair' command works well
> each time...
> 
> Context: Luminous 12.2.10, Bluestore OSD with data block on SATA disks and
> WAL/DB on NVMe, rbd configuration replica 3/2
> 
> Cheers,
> rv
> 
> Few outputs:
> 
> $ sudo ceph -s
>   cluster:
>     id:     838506b7-e0c6-4022-9e17-2d1cf9458be6
>     health: HEALTH_ERR
>             3 scrub errors
>             Possible data damage: 3 pgs inconsistent
> 
>   services:
>     mon: 3 daemons, quorum inf-ceph-mon0,inf-ceph-mon1,inf-ceph-mon2
>     mgr: inf-ceph-mon0(active), standbys: inf-ceph-mon1, inf-ceph-mon2
>     mds: cephfs_home-2/2/2 up
> {0=inf-ceph-mon1=up:active,1=inf-ceph-mon0=up:active}, 1 up:standby
>     osd: 126 osds: 126 up, 126 in
> 
>   data:
>     pools:   3 pools, 4224 pgs
>     objects: 23.35M objects, 20.9TiB
>     usage:   64.9TiB used, 136TiB / 201TiB avail
>     pgs:     4221 active+clean
>              3    active+clean+inconsistent
> 
>   io:
>     client:   2.62KiB/s rd, 2.25MiB/s wr, 0op/s rd, 118op/s wr
> 
> $ sudo ceph health detail
> HEALTH_ERR 3 scrub errors; Possible data damage: 3 pgs inconsistent
> OSD_SCRUB_ERRORS 3 scrub errors
> PG_DAMAGED Possible data damage: 3 pgs inconsistent
>     pg 9.27 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [78,107,96]
>     pg 9.260 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [84,113,62]
>     pg 9.6b9 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [79,107,80]
> $ sudo rados list-inconsistent-obj 9.27 --format=json-prettyrados
> list-inconsistent-obj 9.27 --format=json-pretty |grep error
>             "errors": [],
>             "union_shard_errors": [
>                 "read_error"
>                     "errors": [
>                         "read_error"
>                     "errors": [],
>                     "errors": [],
> $ sudo rados list-inconsistent-obj 9.260 --format=json-prettyrados
> list-inconsistent-obj 9.260 --format=json-pretty |grep error
>             "errors": [],
>             "union_shard_errors": [
>                 "read_error"
>                     "errors": [],
>                     "errors": [],
>                     "errors": [
>                         "read_error"
> $ sudo rados list-inconsistent-obj 9.6b9 --format=json-prettyrados
> list-inconsistent-obj 9.6b9 --format=json-pretty |grep error
>             "errors": [],
>             "union_shard_errors": [
>                 "read_error"
>                     "errors": [
>                         "read_error"
>                     "errors": [],
>                     "errors": [],
> $ sudo ceph pg repair 9.27
> instructing pg 9.27 on osd.78 to repair
> $ sudo ceph pg repair 9.260
> instructing pg 9.260 on osd.84 to repair
> $ sudo ceph pg repair 9.6b9
> instructing pg 9.6b9 on osd.79 to repair
> $ sudo ceph -s
>   cluster:
>     id:     838506b7-e0c6-4022-9e17-2d1cf9458be6
>     health: HEALTH_OK
> 
>   services:
>     mon: 3 daemons, quorum inf-ceph-mon0,inf-ceph-mon1,inf-ceph-mon2
>     mgr: inf-ceph-mon0(active), standbys: inf-ceph-mon1, inf-ceph-mon2
>     mds: cephfs_home-2/2/2 up
> {0=inf-ceph-mon1=up:active,1=inf-ceph-mon0=up:active}, 1 up:standby
>     osd: 126 osds: 126 up, 126 in
> 
>   data:
>     pools:   3 pools, 4224 pgs
>     objects: 23.35M objects, 20.9TiB
>     usage:   64.9TiB used, 136TiB / 201TiB avail
>     pgs:     4224 active+clean
> 
>   io:
>     client:   195KiB/s rd, 7.19MiB/s wr, 17op/s rd, 127op/s wr
> 
> 
> 
> Le 19/12/2018 à 04:48, Frank Ritchie a écrit :
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I have been receiving alerts for:
> >
> >Possible data damage: 1 pg inconsistent
> >
> >almost daily for a few weeks now. When I check:
> >
> >rados list-inconsistent-obj $PG --format=json-pretty
> >
> >I will always see a read_error. When I run a deep scrub on the PG I will
> >see:
> >
> >head candidate had a read error
> >
> >When I check dmesg on the osd node I see:
> >
> >blk_update_request: critical medium error, dev sdX, sector 123
> >
> >I will also see a few uncorrected read errors in smartctl.
> >
> >Info:
> >Ceph: ceph version 12.2.4-30.el7cp
> >OSD: Toshiba 1.8TB SAS 10K
> >120 OSDs total
> >
> >Has anyone else seen these alerts occur almost daily? Can the errors
> >possibly be due to deep scrubbing too aggressively?
> >
> >I realize these errors indicate potential failing drives but I can't
> >replace a drive daily.
> >
> >thx
> >Frank
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


-- 
Kein Backup - kein Mitleid
Christoph Adomeit
GATWORKS GmbH
Reststrauch 191
41199 Moenchengladbach
Sitz: Moenchengladbach
Amtsgericht Moenchengladbach, HRB 6303
Geschaeftsfuehrer:
Christoph Adomeit, Hans Wilhelm Terstappen

christoph.adom...@gatworks.de     Internetloesungen vom Feinsten
Fon. +49 2166 9149-32                      Fax. +49 2166 9149-10
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to