It has been resolved.
It seems that it in fact only removes the objects which you list with
the list_missing
option.


On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:42 AM Mathijs van Veluw <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello.
> I have a question about `ceph pg {pg.num} mark_unfound_lost delete`.
> Will this only delete objects which are unfound, or the whole PG which you
> put in as an argument?
> Objects (oid's) which i can see with `ceph pg {pg.num} list_missing`?
> So in the case bellow, would it remove the object
> "rbd_data.e53c3c27c0089c.00000000000001c7"?
>
> If so that would be great, since e53c3c27c0089c is not linked to any
> volume any more.
>
>
> ceph pg 65.2d0 list_missing
> {
>     "offset": {
>         "oid": "",
>         "key": "",
>         "snapid": 0,
>         "hash": 0,
>         "max": 0,
>         "pool": -9223372036854775808,
>         "namespace": ""
>     },
>     "num_missing": 2,
>     "num_unfound": 2,
>     "objects": [
>         {
>             "oid": {
>                 "oid": "rbd_data.e53c3c27c0089c.00000000000001c7",
>                 "key": "",
>                 "snapid": -2,
>                 "hash": 3857244880,
>                 "max": 0,
>                 "pool": 65,
>                 "namespace": ""
>             },
>             "need": "613065'497508155",
>             "have": "0'0",
>             "locations": []
>         },
>         {
>             "oid": {
>                 "oid": "rbd_data.e53c3c27c0089c.0000000000000059",
>                 "key": "",
>                 "snapid": -2,
>                 "hash": 2362866384,
>                 "max": 0,
>                 "pool": 65,
>                 "namespace": ""
>             },
>             "need": "612939'497508050",
>             "have": "0'0",
>             "locations": []
>         }
>     ],
>     "more": 0
> }
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Mathijs
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to