Hello Kai,

there are tons of bad SSDs on the market. You cannot buy any brand without
having some bad and maybe some good models.

Here as an example some performance values from Intel:

Intel SSD DC S4600 960GB, 2.5", SATA (SSDSC2KG960G701)
jobs=1 - iops=23k
jobs=5 - iops=51k

Intel SSD D3-S4510 960GB, 2.5", SATA (SSDSC2KB960G801)
jobs=1 - iops=10k
jobs=5 - iops=22k

The Samsung PM863a you mentioned is quite a good SSD for general purpose
and cost efficiency, unfortunately Samsung seems to no longer produce this
drive and try to sell the PM883 instead. Performance seems to be near the
same, and maybe it will be a good choice too.

--
Martin Verges
Managing director

Mobile: +49 174 9335695
E-Mail: [email protected]
Chat: https://t.me/MartinVerges

croit GmbH, Freseniusstr. 31h, 81247 Munich
CEO: Martin Verges - VAT-ID: DE310638492
Com. register: Amtsgericht Munich HRB 231263

Web: https://croit.io
YouTube: https://goo.gl/PGE1Bx


Am Di., 12. März 2019 um 09:14 Uhr schrieb Kai Wembacher <
[email protected]>:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I have an Intel D3-S4610 SSD with 1.92 TB here for testing and get some
> pretty bad numbers, when running the fio benchmark suggested by Sébastien
> Han (
> http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/
> ):
>
>
>
> Intel D3-S4610 1.92 TB
>
> --numjobs=1 write: IOPS=3860, BW=15.1MiB/s (15.8MB/s)(905MiB/60001msec)
>
> --numjobs=2 write: IOPS=7138, BW=27.9MiB/s (29.2MB/s)(1673MiB/60001msec)
>
> --numjobs=4 write: IOPS=12.5k, BW=48.7MiB/s (51.0MB/s)(2919MiB/60002msec)
>
>
>
> Compared to our current Samsung SM863 SSDs the Intel one is about 6x
> slower.
>
>
>
> Has someone here tested this SSD and can give me some values for
> comparison?
>
>
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> Kai
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to