On 6/20/2019 10:12 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
I will try to reproduce with logs and create a tracker once I find the
smoking gun...
It's very strange -- I had the osd mode set to 'passive', and pool
option set to 'force', and the osd was compressing objects for around
15 minutes. Then suddenly it just stopped compressing, until I did
'ceph daemon osd.130 config set bluestore_compression_mode force',
where it restarted immediately.
FTR, it *should* compress with osd bluestore_compression_mode=none and
the pool's compression_mode=force, right?
right but it looks like there is a bug: osd compression algorithm isn't
applied when osd compression mode set to none. Hence no compression if
pool lacks explicit algorithm specification.
-- dan
-- Dan
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 6:57 PM Igor Fedotov <ifedo...@suse.de> wrote:
I'd like to see more details (preferably backed with logs) on this...
On 6/20/2019 6:23 PM, Dan van der Ster wrote:
P.S. I know this has been discussed before, but the
compression_(mode|algorithm) pool options [1] seem completely broken
-- With the pool mode set to force, we see that sometimes the
compression is invoked and sometimes it isn't. AFAICT,
the only way to compress every object is to set
bluestore_compression_mode=force on the osd.
-- dan
[1] http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados/operations/pools/#set-pool-values
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 4:33 PM Dan van der Ster <d...@vanderster.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to compress an rbd pool via backfilling the existing data,
and the allocated space doesn't match what I expect.
Here is the test: I marked osd.130 out and waited for it to erase all its data.
Then I set (on the pool) compression_mode=force and compression_algorithm=zstd.
Then I marked osd.130 to get its PGs/objects back (this time compressing them).
After a few 10s of minutes we have:
"bluestore_compressed": 989250439,
"bluestore_compressed_allocated": 3859677184,
"bluestore_compressed_original": 7719354368,
So, the allocated is exactly 50% of original, but we are wasting space
because compressed is 12.8% of original.
I don't understand why...
The rbd images all use 4MB objects, and we use the default chunk and
blob sizes (in v13.2.6):
osd_recovery_max_chunk = 8MB
bluestore_compression_max_blob_size_hdd = 512kB
bluestore_compression_min_blob_size_hdd = 128kB
bluestore_max_blob_size_hdd = 512kB
bluestore_min_alloc_size_hdd = 64kB
From my understanding, backfilling should read a whole 4MB object from
the src osd, then write it to osd.130's bluestore, compressing in
512kB blobs. Those compress on average at 12.8% so I would expect to
see allocated being closer to bluestore_min_alloc_size_hdd /
bluestore_compression_max_blob_size_hdd = 12.5%.
Does someone understand where the 0.5 ratio is coming from?
Thanks!
Dan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
