On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Denis Ovsienko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Basic functionality >> ******************* >> >> For IPv6, Babel/Quagga should be just as functional as the standalone >> implementation. >> >> For IPv4, you need to have a prefix on your interfaces that covers all >> your neighbours, and the prefixes on all of your interfaces must be >> disjoint. This is standard practice in traditional networks, but of >> course not in pure meshes. >> >> You can check whether you're bitten by that by typing "show ip route"; >> if any of the Babel routes are marked as inactive, that's probably your >> problem. > > There are commits in RE-testing-0.99 addressing onlink nexthop management in > zebra and babeld. The problem should be gone on Linux, could anyone confirm?
I have put this version of quagga-re into the Ceropackages-3.3 repository for openwrt, which I keep on github. It does compile, but I'm not in a position to test right now. Ceropackages can be added to any given openwrt feed, and built for any target (hint, hint) However I did put these new quagga binary packages for the wndr3700v2 and wndr3800 up with a very "testy" cerowrt release (with some problems that I need to resolve before making a build more widely available ! notably a firewall issue or three ) They are on my dev box at: http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero1/3.3/3.3.8-4/ I'm *delighted* to see this fix as well as the cool new authentication code. -- Dave Täht SKYPE: davetaht http://ronsravings.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
