I just noticed that this went to cerowrt-users. There aren't a whole lot of people on that list and this stuff is in heavy development so, forwarding the thread here....
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > Radvd is going away in the BB ("barrier breaker" - openwrt head) > version of openwrt, fairly soon. It deserves to die... > > There is going to be a merger of the DHCPv6/SLAAC and naming > functionalities in dnsmasq and the dynamicism of the new ipv6-support > package, which also includes a spanking new dhcpv6-pd client.. > > Also planned is to (once the 3.7 kernel lands) make npt66 the default > (for most users). So in a couple weeks, all the underlying ipv6 > infrastructure in openwrt and cerowrt is going to change. > > As to whether the 6in4 case is fully handled as of now in that system, > damned if I know. Same goes for 6to4... I put the ipv6-support package > into cerowrt 3.6.9-5, all forms of ipv6 are blocked at the lincs lab, > can't test it, right now. > > As for how to fix it in cerowrt 3.3.8, it was always problematic as > hell, and I'm glad the work is being re-architected in BB by two of > the most competent people I know, and I've signed cerowrt (and thus, > y'all) up to test it when it comes out. It would be great to recruit > more help, because *this time* we're going to get it right, come hell > or high water. > > I'm very pleased, in particular, with dnsmasq's naming support for > slaac. It "just works". > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> First question, why are there two radvd processes? >> >> 3343 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys >> 3345 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stderr_sys >> >> Is this just a thread issue? >> >> second question, none of my custom interfaces are in /var/etc/radvd.conf? >> >> Can I hack /etc/config/firewall directly rather than go through the UI? >> I think so....? >> >> Could I attach blinking LEDs to VLANs? >> (ps: whatever problems I had with ethernet mii between my cerowrt and >> a cisco 200-26 switch in the summer, seems to have gone away) >> >> On an IPv6 interface which is not my uplink, I think that IPv6 gateway >> should be blank. That the router should advertise iself. >> >> I also think that the words "Send router soliciations" is wrong, that it >> should say, "Send router advertisements". >> >> I had to put my custom interfaces into /etc/config/radvd. >> >> config interface >> option interface 'trusted' >> option AdvSendAdvert '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '1' >> option AdvLinkMTU '1480' >> option ignore '0' >> option IgnoreIfMissing '1' >> option AdvSourceLLAddress '1' >> option AdvDefaultPreference 'medium' >> option AdvOtherConfigFlag '1' >> >> config prefix >> option interface 'trusted' >> list prefix '' >> option AdvOnLink '1' >> option AdvAutonomous '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '0' >> option ignore '0' >> >> I don't see a place in the UI where this is edited, but I could be >> missing it. >> >> -- >> ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls >> [ >> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net >> architect[ >> ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device >> driver[ >> Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE> >> then sign the petition. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
