On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Rick Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > If there are bugs/issues in Linux's TFO (and IIRC, Linux is the only stack > with TFO at present) it would probably be best to have that discussion in > netdev. At the very least it will have to "finish" in netdev anyway. > > As for TFO and tools, theoretically, netperf top-of-trunk now has both > client and server side support, though I've not been able to get it > particularly tested as yet. I am however, quite happy to discuss bugs in > netperf's use of TFO here rather than netperf-talk :) > > happy benchmarking, > > rick jones
Both the TFO enabled httping and netperf are now checked into the ceropackages-3.3 repo, and will be built on the next build of cerowrt 3.6.X (obviously not fully functional until 3.7) I note that the netperf appears to require that TCP_FASTOPEN be defined by the underlying C library. Mine (glibc and uclibc) haven't caught up yet, from a cursory grep... I will add a patch to define it if not available unless rick beats me to it... (httping just defines it as 23) Are there any other tools/apps available to test TCP_FASTOPEN? I note that I currently fire off netserver via xinetd which I suppose would need to be modified. -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
