On 1/30/13 10:03 PM, Ketan Kulkarni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:19 PM, William Allen Simpson
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 1/29/13 11:24 PM, Ketan Kulkarni wrote:
You can submit the patches to this list, ccing Dave, or you can attach
it to the reported bugs for better future tracking.
All standard linux formatting applies here as well.
OK. I have various TCP, TCPCT (RFC 6013) and RFC1323bis patches from
several years ago. I'm slowly updating my patches from 2.6.33 and .37
to 3.7.4, but pretty much nothing is patching cleanly -- so it's going
to be a long hard slog.
Yes there was a discussion about TCPCT recently on this list.
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/2013-January/000887.html
Aha, just the kinda thing that I was looking for....
...
Though I personally haven't looked at the security aspect of TFO, it
would be good to have wider views on the same. At the same time around
Dave pointed me to TCPCT RFC.
I've actually got a preliminary "TFO Considered Harmful" written, but
was waiting for their RFC to be published.
Gettys had invited me here (from TCPM WG) some time ago, and I actually
bought a pair of WNDR3800 last February specifically to run CeroWRT.
But then the release seemed very unstable at the time, and I stuck with
the Netgear code and gave one to a brother.
I am now running sugarland. I'll start submitting proposed patches
(tested on a spare linux box, not risking my access to the net) via
the Issues. I'm patching against .../stable/linux-stable.git, but it
compiles as 2.8.0-rc3+ -- is that what CeroWRT is/will be using?
I was looking for a .git repository and compile instructions, but
didn't find anything under Documents or Files.
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
