On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have been collecting statistics on the behavior of the 3.7.5-2 version >> of cerowrt, and perhaps y'all out there can help. I've been doing four >> repeatable tests. >> >> I feed the attached file into the chrome web page benchmark and run it 4 >> times: >> >> 1) No other load on the system >> 2) while running a single up and single down netperf stream to icei.org(on >> the east coast) >> 3) then while still loaded, after turning on simple_qos.sh, set for ~85% >> of the rated up/down bandwidth... >> 4) then killing the load, and keeping simple_qos enabled. >> > Is that good if I run the chrome benchmark from a win7 laptop on 802.11n > wifi, while netperfs are going from the wndr3800? > sure. So long as the circumstances are documented, all data is good. (well, a start!) I note it would be helpful to also collect the ping rtt to the netperf server you are using.... > > Regards, > Maciej > -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
_______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
