On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 15:13 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> writes: > > > What do you mean ? This makes little sense to me. > > The data from my previous post > (http://archive.tohojo.dk/bufferbloat-data/long-rtt/throughput.txt) > shows fq_codel achieving higher aggregate throughput in some cases than > pfifo_fast does. > > > I did not received a copy of your setup, so its hard to tell. But > > using netem correctly is tricky. > > The setup is this: > > Client <--100mbit--> Gateway <--10mbit--> netem box <--10mbit--> Server > > The netem box adds 100ms of latency to each of its interfaces (with no > other qdisc applied).
OK, thats a total of 200 ms RTT. Its a pretty high value :( Could you send "tc -s qdisc" taken at netem box ? _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
