I'll take a look. I WAS swamped, today is the first day off I've had in a while...
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: > Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> writes: > >> I would love if this functionality, if not the implementation, would >> end up in the next version of the AQM scripts… > > Hi Sebastian > > Thanks for the modifications; I'm pretty swamped for the rest of August, > so won't have time to test out your modifications until sometime in > September (although Dave may have). I'll try to look at it then, but my > backlog will probably be longish, so no idea when I'll get around to it. > If you come up with more improvements in the meantime, feel free to post > those. > > Also, any chance you could post your changes as a git-compatible diff > against the repo at https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.3 (the > relevant packages are luci/luci-app-aqm and net/aqm-scripts)? :) > > -Toke > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
