there has been ipv6 nat support in cero for a while, if anyone wants to try it.
Rumor has it that comcast is only handing out a /60 address, which, while enough for 2.5 cero routers is kind of annoying compared to the address cornucopia that is ipv6. I'm not happy with the state of AHCP, but as it's possible to get by on a single /64 with that + babel, perhaps more will fiddle with that, too. Similarly I kind of foresee ipv6 nat happening for tethered phones, too, Anyway, ipv6 nat. in the same sentence. I wish it didn't have to have come to this... -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
