Hi Maciej,
On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:23 , Maciej Soltysiak <mac...@soltysiak.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Story from slashodot: > A guy moved to a low speed DSL connection. When describing what he's > done to make it work better, among other things, he mentioned he > configured QoS to be below his cap. He put 1100 Mb limit on a 1500 Mb > line. So he is shaping down to 73.34% of his link, probably following the instructions from http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/qos-tutorial.68795/ . From personal experience I can say that with cerowrt's aqm and the proper link layer I get decent latency results with just shaping down to 95% of link rate. I just checked and it does not seem that the current tomato fork he uses takes the link layer into account…. So trying cerowrt seems a worthwhile experiment for him to undertake. But from the writeup I assume he is quite happy as is and coming down from 32Mbit/s no matter what 1.5Mbit/s will feel slower. > > He's not using the benefits of fq_codel on his TomatoUSB but he's on > the right track. > > His intuition is good: > http://www.tidbitsfortechs.com/2013/12/surviving-internet-on-low-speed-dsl/ > > Would be cool for him to check out latest openwrt if his device can handle it. > > Best regards, > Maciej > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
