On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Rich Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I think we have consensus. I have modified the text of the Setting up SQM > page as described in the earlier messages > (https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/2014-January/001997.html) > The wiki now says: > http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Setting_up_SQM_for_CeroWrt_310 > > Next, the CeroWrt 3.10.26-2 GUI needs these changes: > > - SQM tab heading needs to say "Smart Queue Management" instead of "Active > Queue Management"
done in the comcast build and for future builds. Incidentally, part of the appeal of "SQM" to me is the first hit is for a fertilizer company. http://steve.savitzky.net/Songs/mushroom/ The song itself is kind of catchy (I don't know if he's online, I have the CD) and can cause earworms on bad days. "It comes from mushrooms, mushrooms, keep them in the dark..." I should also point out that multiple other schemes qualify as SQM in my mind: gargoyle-router's ACC in particular, but also streamboost, and qos-scripts, wondershaper, etc. We could still use a brandname. > - Change the text of the paragraph to say, "... and prioritization on a > single interface." Not sure where this goes. Current comcast code says: m = Map("sqm", translate("Smart Queue Management"), translate("With <abbr title=\"Smart Queue Management\">SQM</abbr> you " .. "can enable traffic shaping, better mixing (Fair Queueing)," .. " active queue length management (AQM) " .. " and prioritisation on one " .. "network interface.")) > - Basic Settings tab: we had discussed removing the "Enable" checkbox and > adding a "None" choice to the "Interface name" dropdown. Is this possible? > (default setting should obviously be "ge00") If not, the tab is fine as-is. Well this opens the problem of people wanting SQM on multiple interfaces, which was a nice feature. > - Queue Discipline tab is fine as-is. > > - Link Layer Adaptation tab's dropdown lists three choices: > - None (default) > - ATM (almost every type of ADSL or DSL) Is the () needed in the drop down > - Ethernet with overhead in (PPoe? pppoa? what?) > - Anything else? > > It would be great to get these changes in the next build. Who can make those > changes? Thanks. I note I'm burnt and just lost a week I could ill afford to this. I have pushed out all sources in the hope someone else can update the build howto and get something that works.... I am travelling this weekend and won't have time to get another build out. Perhaps more cool stuff can land. I have a wishlist. :) Perhaps someone can find a cure to the he problem but I fear it's buried deep in a script or in ubus. > Rich > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
