On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Sebastian Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > TL:DR version, netalyzr probes a buffer depth that while existing has > not much relevance on the latency behavior under load for cerowrt. Yes, it doesn't have much relevance for latency where fq_codel or similar are employed. But where it's not (or where fq_codel is defeated by DOS style traffic), it seems this comes back as a meaningful metric. In the end codel is workaround for overbuffering, which is not being removed very hastily.
Best regards, Maciej _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
