On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> while we need to drop packets from ULA src at the *WAN* edge, I am > wondering btw, there is full ipv6 NAT support in this release. Untested. > > That said, surviving an ipv6 renumber is a problem. Many clients > probably > > don't respect an address assignment lifetime. > > I have experimental evidence that it's the opposite: clients give up their > address and on-linkness way too easily. I have seen that too, particularly on wireless interfaces that go to sleep. One thing I liked that dnsmasq did that the current odhcpv6 server does not is force a RA on a dhcpv4 request. Perhaps hostapd could do the same on a reassociation in some sane way. > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
