Does anyone care/have a use for at the moment - pcp for ipv6?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: miniupnp <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:15 AM Subject: Re: *Wrt PCP support? To: Markus Stenberg <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Taht <[email protected]>, Steven Barth <[email protected]> Hello, I have made the necessary changes so miniupnpd listen for IPv6 packets sent to PCP port (5351) https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/commit/ad88cc0819321eb2841958f846138ac3a225152f There is still work to enable the "IPv6 firewall" and NAT64 PCP scenarios. The PCP code was assuming the client want NAT44. Regards, Thomas Le 07/03/2014 12:52, Markus Stenberg a écrit : > On 7.3.2014, at 11.45, miniupnp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Le 07/03/2014 12:19, Markus Stenberg a écrit : >> >>> On 7.3.2014, at 11.00, miniupnp <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Of course it is IPv4 oriented, nobody needs port mapping for IPv6... >>>> >>>> >>> Well, given default-deny IPv6 firewall, I'd agree to disagree with you. (It >>> can be used to make holes in firewall on IPv6 side.) >>> >>> >> Don't forget to configure miniupnpd for IPv6 and PCP support : >> ./genconfig.sh --ipv6 --pcp-peer >> --igd2 : some clients have compatibility issues with IGDv2 (XBox) but it >> adds the "IPv6 pinhole" service to make hole in firewall. >> > Sounds cool, I'll play with it, thanks. > > Peter Tatrai told me the IPv6 pinhole stuff isn't done for PCP, but he > guessed it wouldn't be very hard to do as you have it already for IGDv2. (We > can take a look at that if it helps, we're paid to care about IPv6.) > > Cheers, > > -Markus -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
