It would be very interesting to see the differences between dnsmasq without DNSSEC, with DNSSEC and with DNSSEC and --dnssec-check-unsigned
Cheers, Simon. On 24/03/14 22:50, Dave Taht wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would certainly like to have a standard way of getting these >> statistics, through the dns, perhaps one unified with whatever bind >> and unbound use (or don't use.) >> >> Not a lot of people seem to be aware of why dns caching forwarders are >> so great, although benchmarks like namebench against your chrome or >> firefox cache are quite revealing, parsing huge network captures as >> I am presently to try to get a grip on timings for dns/response >> pairing is a pita and not router centric. >> >> However: >> >> Do check out namebench, it's pretty cool. It does bug me that in tests >> against the alexa top 2000 that it invariably selects some other dns >> server besides your local one as being the "best", because it has >> the best average - as if you regularly go to websites in timbuktu and >> care about the response time more than, say, google. >> >> Example against alexa top 2000 with a fresh cache: >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/namebench/namebench_2014-03-20_1255.html >> >> It is much better to test against your more common query set, which I >> don't have a snapshot of on that site presently - usually 40% or more >> of queries are resolved in a ms, 30% or so via your ISP in under 20ms. >> >> I'd love to see people posting namebench results from against their >> firefox/chrome caches... it's in apt on ubuntu at least.... >> >> the version I have is buggy, you have to hit control-C at least once >> for the gui to come up. > > > I just did a namebench test against my local firefox cache (without clearing > dnsmasq's caches) > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/namebench/namebench_2014-03-24_1541.html > > note that I have three dns servers in place - one on my local machine, > a dnsmasq locally that is sending stuff over ipv6 to another dnsmasq > which is then connected over ipv4 and ipv6 to comcasts forwarders. > >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Simon Kelley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 24/03/14 11:25, Olivier Mauras wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I was wondering what would be the effort, and if there'd >>>> actually be any interest for some dnsmasq statistics improvements. (Yes >>>> i'm splitting dicussions ^^) >>>> For monitoring/graph purposes, actual >>>> dnsmasq stats are a bit difficult to use and completely unusable if >>>> using "log_queries" as it takes too long to retrieve them inside >>>> logs. >>>> >>>> I'd love to see a stats "interface" that would output >>>> total_queries, cache_hits, cache_misses, memory used by cache, >>>> etc.... >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Olivier >>>> >>> >>> There's an idea to make this available as a DNS query, in the same way that >>> >>> >>> dig chaos txt version.bind >>> >>> returns the version number. >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Simon. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Täht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > > > _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
