On 2014-04-19 05:26, Dave Taht wrote:
> Could part of it be as simple as not checking for '<=' but only < in
> txq_max_pending below?
I don't see how that would make any meaningful difference in practice.
By the way, did you test my patch?
> in ath_tx_start:
>
> ath_txq_lock(sc, txq);
> if (txq == sc->tx.txq_map[q] &&
> ++txq->pending_frames > sc->tx.txq_max_pending[q] &&
> !txq->stopped) {
> ieee80211_stop_queue(sc->hw, q);
> txq->stopped = true;
> }
>
> in ath_txq_skb_done:
>
> if (txq->stopped &&
> txq->pending_frames < sc->tx.txq_max_pending[q]) {
> ieee80211_wake_queue(sc->hw, q);
> txq->stopped = false;
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
