As I pointed out here, there is more work to be done on that front http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/S-FQ-CoDel-Support-Possible/m-p/799394#M28651
Mostly my hope is to get a SQM-like shaper/aqm/scheduler rewritten in the vyatta command language that works at rates up to 200Mbit. All the published examples have problems: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bufferbloat for example, uses SFQ and a very small queue length that is probably ineffective. There have been various other examples forwarded to me that all need some love, including one very elaborate one that uses ifb semi-correctly, and then goes nutso with ack prioritization. (can't find any of these now) ... And it did look that adding BQL support was easily possible for the underlying driver, but I didn't sink any time into that - the key "driver" (it's really an interface to a binary blob) is in: drivers/net/ethernet/octeon and it's unclear how much buffering is built into the blob. -- Dave Täht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
