I've been looking for a copy of this paper for a long time, and finally found it.
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~sylvia/cs268-2014/papers//FQ1989.pdf On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:25 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Dave Taht wrote: > >> ... In particular when it came to getting minimal interference on all >> the wifi access points. It is better to have fewer, better wifi APs >> with a co-ordinated channel allocation strategy in an apartment >> building than everybody installing one willy-nilly. > > > the key is the co-ordinated channel allocation, beyond that it can be better > to have more, "worse" wifi APs than fewer "better" ones to reduce > interference. > >> http://www.frankston.com/public/?name=20140717-0146 > > > looks interesting > > >> BTW: When I find an interesting link, these days, I tend to just put >> it on my g+ rather than the email lists, and tend to feel I'm wasting >> other people's bandwidth by doing it on the list - although sometimes >> a good discussion is sparked. Should I stop forwarding stuff like this >> (and the mit paper) to the list? > > > to the list, even if it's a link I don't care about, it's easier to delete > it along with other e-mail than to go to G+ and look at it. > > Also, remember that people's G+ feeds show a sampling of what other people > post, so some people will miss it if you only post it to G+ > > David Lang -- Dave Täht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
