On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:03 -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > A side note: It's taken me a long time to finally realize what was > wrong with level3's recent blog posting here: > > http://blog.level3.com/global-connectivity/observations-internet-middleman/ > > The loss chart on the right here that they show to support their > argument that the current interconnects are "incurring excessive delay > and loss" fails utterly to support their argument - > > http://blog.level3.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/route_info_1.jpg > > It SHOULD show diurnal variance, and doesn't. The loss rates it shows > are both consistent and quite low, compared to the bandwidth being > used up, (indicating more of a cabling problem? or excessive load on > the other switch? or?)
The right graph is in log scale while the left i linear, I'd say they show the same pattern. As for loss rate, may be the real "big" loss number is on another interface in the chain. Sincerely, Laurent _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
